Letter: Voters’ Right To Know
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
To the Editor:
With highly charged elections looming, we are all experiencing the onslaught of massive amounts of mailings — some informative, some negative and some, well to put it gently, downright fabrications.
I am opposed to negative campaigning, particularly that which inaccurately portrays a person’s experience, affiliations and record.
However, pointing out someone’s prior experience and affiliations should not, on face, be considered negative, rather, it should be viewed as informative. Voters of the 34th District have a right to know the background and affiliations of the candidates because those experiences typically mold the way a candidate will perform in office.
If a candidate’s background discloses a penchant for strong partisanship then it is likely that candidate would not seek bipartisan solutions when in Richmond. If a candidate has not focused in many years on local issues, then it is unlikely they would do so while in office.
It is surprising that Barbara Comstock (R) would complain about being linked to people she worked with. Is it negative to tell voters that she worked with and supported political luminaries like Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Tom Delay? I am certain that there are people in our community who have the highest regard for these politicians. Barbara should not be ashamed to be identified with them. It would be unusual had Barbara not learned from and benefited from those relationships.
Let’s be fair, if Comstock is going to continually highlight her brief legislative experience with U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf’s (R-10) office, which occurred 15 years ago, as a significant reason why she should be elected, then she should be willing and proud to have her more recent work experiences highlighted as well.
As a supporter of Del. Margi Vanderhye (D-34), I appreciate the work she has been doing at the grassroots level for the last 20 years, and I urge my neighbors in this community to look beyond the complaints and examine the backgrounds of both of these candidates to find the truth and make an informed decision.
Judi Nardella Hershman
McLean
Letter: Comstock’s Risky Road Funding Idea
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
To the Editor:
During the Oct. 6 debate involving the two opponents vying to represent Virginia’s 34th District in the House of Delegates, Republican candidate Barbara Comstock spoke highly of Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, Bush’s first OMB director, who gained extra cash for his state by leasing a toll road to two foreign companies for the next 75 years.
While both Comstock and incumbent Del. Margi Vanderhye (D) are in favor of addressing Virginia’s transportation problems and generating new income streams to do so, Indiana’s model is, in my opinion, flawed. It is shortsighted and a much better deal for the foreign companies than for the citizens who will be paying more for using the road. Yes, Indiana got a new stream of revenue amounting to some $3.8 billion in a deal brokered by Goldman Sachs Group in 2006. But the foreign investors will recoup their investment early in the lease and are likely to reap $21 billion in profits according to an estimate published in a May 7, 2007 BusinessWeek cover story.
Daniels’ stewardship has also been questioned by Hoosier Democrats as $3 billion of the funds were placed in a portfolio with 22 percent invested in Fannie Mae and nearly 10 percent more in junk bonds.
The shortsightedness of selling off public resources and having private companies collect tolls may not be apparent in the early years of a leasing deal but beware of the later years. The newfound allure of privatizing roads is not really new. We do have lessons from the past about this phenomenon. As Washington Post staff writer Amy Goldman, noted, this “new” trend of privatizing roads, is part of a cycle: “It reverses the view of highways as a public responsibility, ingrained since the first half of the 19th century, when states took over roads, bridges and canals that had gone bankrupt in private hands.” (WP, June 14, 2006)
Granted Virginia does have its own privately owned toll road, the Dulles Greenway. The Greenway has a checkered past. Its main developer was former Reagan Administration transportation official Ralph Stanley. The Greenway’s anemic start resulted in a default on its original financing, followed by refinancing by the non-defunct Bear Stearns. In the period 2003 to 2005, the Greenway’s ownership shifted from majority U.S. ownership to the point that nearly 90 percent of the Greenway is owned by the same Australian firm that is involved in Daniels’ Indiana toll road deal. The Greenway is only about one-third through its lease and has slightly less than 50 years to go as a foreign firm reaps profits that could have gone to Virginia’s needed transportation improvements. Will it be the end of such schemes in Virginia or is it the beginning?
Privatizing roads may be an option to consider, but candidate Comstock’s idea of emulating Bush’s former OMB director is one of the riskier ideas coming down the pike.
Allan Kellum
McLean
Letter: Clear Winner In McLean Debate
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
To the Editor:
On Tuesday, Oct. 6, I watched the McLean Citizens Association’s Debate for the 34th District House of Delegates candidates. After hearing both candidates answer questions, I think there was no doubt that Del. Margi Vanderhye (D-34) was the clear winner. Throughout the debate, Barbara Comstock (R) continually brought up federal issues. This is not surprising since she has spent her entire career working at the national level. She repeatedly brought up the issue of Unionization and the Right to Work laws in Virginia. Trying to invoke unnecessary fear into voters is right up Comstock’s alley. She is a close associate of Karl Rove, who is the master of fear-mongering politics.
As Vanderhye stated, the truth of the matter is that unionization in Virginia is only at 4 percent. No one is challenging the Right to Work status of Virginia’s workforce and unions certainly were not a threat to the two Fortune 500 companies that moved to this district in the past
year.
Further, Comstock’s mention that more than half of Vanderhye’s contributions came from unions was an outright lie. While Vanderhye has gained the support of several unions, she also has the support of the Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce and the Northern Virginia
Technology Council TechPAC. These business friendly organizations clearly do not think that Vanderhye is a threat to the good business environment that has made Virginia the best state to do business for years now.
Ultimately, Comstock had nothing of substance to bring to the table. Her sound bites will do nothing for our area and her refusal to discuss real issues is all the more evidence that she is not fit to serve in Richmond. I look forward to voting for Margi Vanderhye on Nov. 3.
Tara Kavaler
McLean
Letter: A Campaign Sign Worthy of Note
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
To the Editor:
As a resident of the 34th District, I have spent the past few months driving through forests of political-campaign signs. They remind me of the college pennants I hung on my wall as a teenager: they express enthusiasm for various candidates. What they do not do — and cannot do — is to show either how deeply candidates understand the issues facing Virginia or how effectively candidates would be in finding solutions to those issues in Richmond.
Two years ago, the 34th District elected Margi Vanderhye (D) to represent us and she proved herself to be outstanding. She told us she would reach across the aisle to solve problems — not an easy task in a harshly partisan legislature — and she did. A strong case in point is her bill to turn agricultural waste into energy, a bill that was passed unanimously by both the House of Delegates and the Senate, a bill whose scope includes a reduction of pollution in the Chesapeake Bay as well as an increase in energy for the state. Beyond those goals, it also creates jobs.
Margi Vanderhye has a campaign sign worthy of note: a fully functioning vertical-axis wind turbine. If there is a strong enough wind, the electricity they generate lights up two DC halogen light bulbs that illuminate the message. The faster the banners rotate, the more light is produced.
She has decades of experience working at the local and state level, including serving Govs. Warner and Kaine. She understands the complexity of the issues facing Virginia, and she knows how to work on both sides of the aisle for solutions. She will have my vote on Nov. 3.
Gail Tenney Nields
McLean
Letter: Delegate Seeks Common Ground
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
To the Editor:
I am responding to recent letters published by the Connection that charged Del. Margi Vanderhye (D-34) of conducting a negative campaign against her opponent, Barbara Comstock (R). This is nonsense. Vanderhye simply pointed out that Comstock is closely associated with Karl Rove, (who happens to be the acknowledged champion of dirty politics) and that Comstock wants to overturn Roe v. Wade and impose limits on women’s reproductive rights. These are facts that voters have a right to know. Pointing out such facts is not dirty campaigning.
Margi Vanderhye has a career of public service based on building bridges across partisan divisions. From her work to assist cancer victims to her efforts to bring together farmers, environmentalists and utility companies in order to promote renewable energy and reduce pollution, she has always worked to find common ground among people and groups with divergent interests. Calling her a dirty campaigner is worse than ironic, it is unfair and dishonest.
J. Jay Volkert
Vienna
Letter: Candidate Met Leadership Test
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
To the Editor:
I want to thank the candidates for 34th District delegate for coming to our community last Thursday evening to discuss the major issues facing us here in Great Falls, as well as elsewhere in the state, and their respective positions on these issues. Clearly, it takes a great deal of courage, initiative and effort to compete for this job. Also required are intelligence, knowledge and experience.
While both candidates are clearly intelligent, the key factor for me is Del. Margi Vanderhye's (D-34) record in applying her intelligence to the issues she has dealt with as a community leader and now as an elected delegate to the Virginia General Assembly. Of particular interest to me are her views about, and initiatives for, protecting the natural environment. I believe that we must move deliberately and substantially, now, to address the causes of environmental degradation, so evident in the air, in the pollution of our rivers and the Chesapeake Bay and in global warming. As difficult as this challenge is, it must be met, in order to secure the future for the next generation and those inheriting this environment thereafter. For decades, as a community leader and as a delegate, Vanderhye has been a strong advocate for a comprehensive program to encourage conservation of the environment and development of renewable energy sources.
Demonstrating her proven ability to work on a bipartisan basis, Vanderhye pointed to her initiation of successful legislation that will facilitate the production of electrical power from farm animal waste; her co-sponsorship a law to provide investor tax credit to encourage development of new technologies and green industries in Virginia. She introduced successful legislation to merge the Innovative Technology Authority with the Virginia Research and Technology Advisory Commission to heighten emphasis on research and development and introduced the bill, successfully passed, that makes possible a program to prevent and treat breast and cervical cancer for women who either could not afford such services or who were under-served in seeking them.
Beyond these successful efforts, I am impressed with Vanderhye's command of the issues relating to education, and especially her emphasis on the need to develop first rate thinkers, not just standard test takers, through the education programs in our public schools and the necessity to continue support for high standards of instruction in our public universities. Her many years of experience in working to address transportation issues in Northern Virginia makes her the person most qualified, I believe, to represent the interests of 34th District residents in the House of Delegates.
In these difficult times, I believe it is essential to have a successful voice in Richmond, one who has met the test of providing effective leadership and who can be trusted to continue this work. This person is candidate and incumbent delegate, Margi Vanderhye.
Eleanor Anderson
Great Falls